The article discusses the implications of voice coaching on Keir Starmer, highlighting how years of training have modified his natural speaking voice into something that can appear insincere. It suggests that Starmer's voice was once quite acceptable and raises concerns over why political advisers chose to alter it. It critiques the notion that such changes improve a politician's image, referencing historical examples like Margaret Thatcher, whose voice changes were perceived as detrimental. Ultimately, the author questions the motivations behind these alterations, pondering the effectiveness of voice coaching in politics.
Starmer's present speaking voice may have been transformed through coaching, producing an effect that some view as mannered and insincere, raising questions about the underlying motives.
Voice coaching can change how a politician is perceived, and in Starmer's case, it seems to have detracted from his natural, sincere delivery.
Collection
[
|
...
]