"Aidan O'Neill, a lawyer for FWS, asserted that under the Equality Act, 'sex' should refer to biological sex as understood 'in ordinary, everyday language.'"
"Trina Budge, director of FWS, emphasized the implications of the legal challenge, stating, 'public boards could conceivably comprise of 50% men, and 50% men with certificates, yet still lawfully meet the targets for female representation.'"
The U.K. Supreme Court is set to determine a crucial legal challenge regarding the definition of 'woman' in the context of equality laws, as contested by the women's rights group For Women Scotland (FWS) against the Scottish government's interpretation. Central to the dispute is a 2018 Scottish law mandating 50% female representation on public boards, including transgender women in this definition. FWS argues that the redefinition has implications for biological sex recognition and services. The outcome could influence sex-based rights across the UK, following previous court decisions.
Read at www.npr.org
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]