"Britain's nuclear deterrent must be genuinely, verifiably ours not dependent on Trump or whoever his successor may be. Trump has proven we can't rely on America as a dependable ally. As the UK now prepares to replace Trident in the 2040s, we should make the decision now to spend the billions required over the next two decades here in the UK, not in the US."
"Britain has the best scientists, the best engineers, the best builders in the world. So let's get building our own, truly independent nuclear deterrent here in the UK."
"The UK has operational control of its nuclear arsenal, including British-built warheads, but it depends on the US to supply and maintain the Trident missiles that would deliver them."
Sir Ed Davey argues the UK should build its own independent nuclear deterrent rather than continuing to depend on American-supplied Trident missiles. Currently, Britain maintains operational control of its nuclear arsenal with British-built warheads, but relies on the US for missile supply and maintenance under a technology-sharing agreement. Davey contends this dependency on American support poses an unacceptable national security risk, citing concerns about US reliability. He proposes that as the UK prepares to replace Trident in the 2040s, the government should invest billions over two decades to develop a British-built deterrent domestically. The Ministry of Defence responded by emphasizing that the current nuclear deterrent provides continuous national security protection.
Read at www.bbc.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]