The Guardian view on Labour's pension reforms: building on flawed foundations | Editorial
Briefly

Since its inception by Otto von Bismarck, retirement savings have grown tremendously, with UK pension funds now at approximately £2 trillion. Rachel Reeves aims to redirect these funds towards revamping the UK's declining infrastructure, drawing inspiration from successful Canadian and Australian models. Despite recognizing that only 20% of pension assets are currently invested domestically, Reeves faces criticism for relying on private market investments known for high fees. The urgency of her proposal reflects wider concerns about Britain's lagging investment levels compared to other G7 nations and the potential vulnerabilities of overseas markets, particularly amid political and economic uncertainties.
Rachel Reeves is urging British pension funds to invest their massive assets in domestic infrastructure rather than overseas markets, calling for a restructuring of retirement savings.
The current trend sees only 20% of pension assets in the UK, with funds leaning towards US markets; Reeves believes this is a missed opportunity for local investment.
Reeves's plan faces criticism as it relies on private market investments that are often costly and may not yield adequate returns relative to their expenses.
The World Economic Forum has highlighted issues with high fees charged by asset managers in private markets, questioning their value for pension fund investments.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]