The article discusses Chris Packham's criticism of Rachel Reeves, who suggested bats hinder economic growth through planning regulations. Reeves' recent remarks downplay the importance of wildlife consultations during building projects, using bats as a primary example. Packham argues that bats are a minor issue in planning refusals and highlights that EU laws from 1992 continue to protect these species. This controversial stance raises concerns about prioritizing economic progress over environmental conservation, as wildlife protection is crucial in planning decisions due to the proximity of habitats to human developments.
Chris Packham criticized Rachel Reeves for scapegoating bats in planning regulations, stating that environmental protections are vital despite their impact on economic growth.
Reeves' comments suggest a desire to prioritize economic growth over environmental protections, which has raised concerns among conservationists like Packham.
Collection
[
|
...
]