Rachel Reeves must rethink how tax and spend decisions are made after welfare U-turn | Heather Stewart
Briefly

The Labour leadership's embarrassing U-turn on welfare cuts reveals significant flaws in their fiscal policy strategy. With rigid rules and narrow margins for error, financial markets have manipulated Labour's decision-making, reducing it to a guessing game. Andrew Bailey, Bank of England governor, criticized this situation, urging for more strategic, long-term fiscal planning instead of constantly reacting to short-term market signals. Experts emphasize the need to shift away from arbitrary adjustments based on Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts, advocating for a more stable economic policy framework to support growth and sustainability.
Rachel Reeves's hand will be forced next, highlighting a grim spectacle where tax and spending decisions rely on binary fiscal rules and narrow margins.
Andrew Bailey noted that having financial markets continually marking fiscal policy isn't beneficial, indicating the urgent need for more stable and long-term planning.
The unnecessary pressure on fiscal policy leads to hasty decisions that prioritize closing gaps identified in OBR forecasts rather than strategic economic growth.
Charlie Bean emphasized the need to avoid frantic changes in taxes and spending to meet OBR forecasts, advocating for a more measured approach to economic policy.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]