The article discusses the contentious debate over zonal pricing in Great Britain's electricity market, which proposes splitting the market into regions for locally-set prices. Proponents, led by Octopus Energy's Greg Jackson, argue it could lower consumer bills by reducing inefficiencies, such as costly payments to windfarms during grid overloads. The National Energy System Operator reported constraint costs at around £1 billion last year. However, critics, including a group of 55 industry signatories, express concern that zonal pricing could contradict government clean energy objectives and insists it would not effectively reduce bills, labeling it fanciful and harmful.
Advocates of zonal pricing argue that it can prevent soaring electricity bills, costing consumers due to current inefficiencies, such as paying over a billion for unnecessary energy constraints.
Supporters believe flexible zonal pricing would encourage building closer generation capacity, enabling demand and supply alignment, ultimately leading to lower consumer prices through more efficient system operation.
Critics, including 55 signatories to a letter, warn that zonal pricing could contradict government clean power goals, dismissing it as impractical and potentially harmful to electricity affordability.
The tug-of-war between supporters and critics of zonal pricing reflects deep division in the energy sector over how best to address escalating needs and costs.
Collection
[
|
...
]