Key China spy case witness removed 'enemy' from evidence under Tories
Briefly

Key China spy case witness removed 'enemy' from evidence under Tories
"A key witness in the China spying case removed the term "enemy" from the final draft of a witness statement submitted to prosecutors, because it did not reflect government policy at the time. In a letter to MPs, deputy national security adviser Matthew Collins said the word "enemy" was included in the draft witness statement written when the Conservatives were in power. But he said he told police investigating the case he "could not call China an "enemy" as this did not reflect government policy"."
"Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has been accused by the Conservatives of allowing the case to collapse earlier this year by not describing China as a threat to national security. Charges against Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry - who deny the allegations - were dropped in September. The Labour government, the Conservatives and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are facing questions over the collapse of the case and who was to blame. Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions (DPP) said the case fell apart because evidence could not be obtained from the government referring to China as a national security threat."
Matthew Collins, deputy national security adviser, removed the term "enemy" from a final witness statement because government policy at the time did not describe China as an enemy. The draft including "enemy" was written while the Conservatives were in power, and Collins told police he could not use that term. Charges against Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry were dropped in September; both defendants deny the allegations. DPP Stephen Parkinson said the prosecution failed because evidence could not be found of government labelling China a national security threat. The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy launched an inquiry and Collins submitted three witness statements and a letter to MPs before giving oral evidence.
Read at www.bbc.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]