Kendall steps up efforts to win over Labour welfare rebels, as Burnham tells MPs to vote against unfair' bill UK politics live
Briefly

Jacqui Smith, the skills minister, discussed the potential consequences for Labour MPs who might vote against the government in upcoming legislation. Although she hinted that MPs could lose the whip, she emphasized dialogue over punishments. Historically, the governing party seldom disciplines MPs for dissent unless it’s a confidence vote. However, the government’s prior actions create concern among rebels, especially about a possible suspension of multiple Labour MPs, which could drastically reduce Labour's majority in Parliament. Speculation about a stricter disciplinary approach has heightened anxiety among party members ahead of the vote.
I think what's important and from my experience as a former chief whip, is to keep talking, keep explaining the moves that the government has already made to recognise some of the concerns.
I don't think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here.
In normal circumstances governing parties almost never remove the whip from MPs just for voting against No 10 on legislation, unless something has been designated a confidence vote.
If 50 Labour MPs were to rebel, as some backbenchers predict, and they were all to face suspension, Starmer's working majority would shrink from 165 to just 65.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]