A high court judge has mandated a swift judicial review regarding the UK government's decision to sell F-35 jet parts to Israel, despite acknowledging the potential breaches of international humanitarian law. This exception was established amidst a suspension of arms exports to Israel, following concerns about Israel's treatment of Palestinians. Internal communications revealed pressure from the Defence Secretary to continue these transactions, citing national security and the repercussions for NATO relations. The decision highlights the tension between national interests and international legal obligations.
The judicial review on selling F-35 parts to Israel raises concerns over compliance with international humanitarian law amid government claims of national security.
Internal correspondence shows Defence Secretary stressed that stopping F-35 components to Israel could have significant consequences for the entire programme and NATO security.
The government acknowledges that F-35 parts could contravene international humanitarian law, complicating its justification for the arms deal with Israel.
Ministers argue that losing UK components could weaken collective security among NATO partners, emphasizing the global implications of perceived weaknesses.
Collection
[
|
...
]