Lord Carey stated that 'the bishops in the House of Lords will not' represent the majority of Anglicans who favor assisted dying. He urged them to embrace compassion in discussing end-of-life options, highlighting a significant disconnect between church leadership and the views of parishioners. Carey's advocacy for Kim Leadbeater's bill reflects a drastic shift from traditional positions, suggesting a need for change in the Church's stance on end-of-life issues. He emphasized that 'it's necessary, compassionate and principled.'
Archbishop Justin Welby characterized Leadbeater's bill as 'dangerous,' warning that assisted dying legislation might exert undue pressure on vulnerable individuals. His concern reflects a broader view within church leadership, prioritizing the sanctity of life over legislative change. He believes that the state should not facilitate assisted suicide and advocates for improved palliative care as a solution to suffering, asserting that true compassion lies in better care rather than legal options.
Rev Canon Rosie Harper pointed out a disconnect between the hierarchy of the Church of England and the beliefs of its congregants, stating that 'many of them actually think' differently than what they express. This underlines a crucial dynamic where traditional teachings may clash with modern societal views, revealing a tension that could influence discussions on issues like assisted dying.
According to Bishop Alan Smith, church leaders have historically opposed assisted dying legislation, claiming that it is 'likely that we will do the same in the future.' This entrenched position indicates an ongoing resistance within the church, despite increasing support for change from both clergy and laity, suggesting a potential for tension in policy and congregational beliefs.
Collection
[
|
...
]