Michael and Bernard engaged in a conversation about energy policies, particularly regarding the transition from fossil fuels. Michael advocated for nuclear power due to its reliability and compactness, while Bernard favored renewable energy sources. They both acknowledged the challenges of current energy projects, particularly the bureaucratic obstacles at Hinkley Point. Their discussion also touched upon historical nuclear accidents, with Michael arguing against judging nuclear energy solely on past incidents like Chernobyl, attributing issues to human error rather than science.
Michael expressed a strong belief in nuclear energy for its reliability and compactness, countering Bernard's focus on renewable energy as a more viable solution.
Bernard reflected on the massive costs associated with the Hinkley Point project, suggesting that bureaucratic red tape in the UK hampers efficient energy project execution.
Collection
[
|
...
]