The article humorously critiques Daniel Hannan, portraying him as a consistently wrong yet celebrated figure in British politics. It revisits his 2016 predictions regarding Brexit, showcasing the irony of his claimed intellectual contributions to the Leave campaign. The author suggests that despite Hannan's status and peerage, his historical misjudgments render him a figure of ridicule rather than respect. The piece questions the celebration of his 'achievements' in contrast to the reality faced post-Brexit, suggesting a disconnect between his expectations and actual outcomes.
"Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, But to be Dan was very heaven! O wondrous day. One of which dreams are made. Especially if you've been taking large quantities of hallucinogenics."
"Yet in that fleeting moment, Dan can achieve great things. Can share the marvels he has seen. For Dan's unique ability is to be wrong about almost everything, all the time."
Collection
[
|
...
]