Justice Ritchie dismissed Kirsty Williams-Henry's claim, calling her a 'regular liar' and stating she had been 'thoroughly dishonest' in presenting her injuries and disabilities.
The Pier's owning company believed she was entitled to only around 370,000, as they alleged she had exaggerated her injuries; the judge concluded that both the claimant and her mother were 'objectively dishonest.'
Collection
[
|
...
]