A Supreme Court case regarding wild camping rights on Dartmoor concluded with a ruling favoring public access. Wealthy landowners Alexander and Diana Darwall challenged existing legislation, which permits camping but restricts activities to walking and horse riding. Their arguments highlighted concerns over livestock and environmental impacts, but the court upheld the decision that allows wild campers to continue enjoying the area. This ruling is celebrated by campaigners as a significant advancement in the battle for countryside access, suggesting broader implications for access rights nationwide.
The high-profile case is seen as a test case for countryside access, with campaigners hopeful it will now mean greater access rights for walkers and campers across the country.
I'm absolutely thrilled with this ruling. It is a vindication of something we've all known for a long time: that the stars are for everyone, and that access to nature is not a nice to have.
Collection
[
|
...
]