The UK government's Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA24) with Microsoft entails a five-year investment of approximately £9 billion, focused on public sector procurement of software and services. The deal claims to enhance value through bundled offerings while raising concerns about whether substantial discounts are achieved or merely reinforce Microsoft's profit margins. The potential addition of Microsoft's AI tool, Copilot, necessitates careful evaluation regarding transparency in pricing and the risk of deepening dependency on proprietary technology, potentially limiting alternative solutions and competition in the market.
The key question is whether this represents genuine value for taxpayers - or whether it's simply the continuation of the status quo under a new label.
If the savings are minimal or opaque, the deal risks reinforcing rather than challenging entrenched market power - leaving the government with limited choice and little leverage.
There is no doubt AI-driven features could boost efficiency, but without transparent comparative pricing, it's impossible to tell whether this is an affordable enhancement or a costly lock-in.
By adopting Copilot as the default AI engine through SPA24, departments could be committing themselves more deeply to Microsoft's ecosystem - potentially at the expense of open-source or cloud-agnostic alternatives.
Collection
[
|
...
]