A computer specialist, identified only as RP, has filed a complaint against MI6's vetting process, arguing that it lacked procedural fairness. The vetting taken by UK Security Vetting (UKSV) was plagued by significant delays, failing to follow up with referees or adequately assess RP's background. After a lengthy six-month vetting process and with concerns over attempted hacking of his accounts after disclosure, RP claims his rights were not respected. The National Audit Office had previously highlighted systemic inefficiencies in UKSV's processing capabilities, further casting a shadow over their methods.
RP argues that his vetting process was flawed due to disorganization, delays, and failure to properly investigate referee feedback, infringing on procedural fairness.
The National Audit Office previously criticized UKSV for processing only 7% of Developed Vetting applications within the required timeframe, citing outdated systems and inefficiencies.
Collection
[
|
...
]