Roger Hallam, a leading figure in Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, was denied home curfew post-appeal due to heightened media interest surrounding his case. Initially sentenced to five years for organizing disruptive protests on the M25 motorway, his time was reduced by one year following an appeal. However, despite expectations of release on March 24, probation staff cited media scrutiny as a key reason for denying his home detention application. Hallam's case underscores the complex interaction between media coverage and judicial decisions on protestors.
Roger Hallam's sentencing vs home curfew denial reflects tensions between media coverage of activism and the judicial process, raising questions on fair treatment of protestors.
Probation officer expressed concern over Hallam's heightened media attention, asserting that it would compromise the suitability of his home detention curfew.
Collection
[
|
...
]