"In light of the obvious severity of the play, I am disappointed and shocked the league would allow such a ruling. A phone hearing and 5 games is laughable and preposterous. While the process is set in our CBA, that this was the discipline is reckless and ridiculous. This decision results in a further loss of confidence in the disciplinary process for all players."
"I believe Auston's been ruled out for quite a while, right, so it's going to be more than five games what he's missing, so easily could've been longer. Can't say five games is nothing but, yeah, easily could have seen it been longer."
Auston Matthews sustained a season-ending Grade 3 MCL tear and quad contusion from a hit during a game against the Anaheim Ducks. The incident prompted strong criticism of the NHL Department of Player Safety, which issued a five-game suspension to the player responsible. Matthews' agent Judd Moldaver expressed severe disappointment with the lenient sanction, calling it laughable and preposterous given the injury's severity. Teammate John Tavares echoed concerns that the suspension was insufficient, noting Matthews would miss significantly more than five games due to his injury. The decision sparked broader concerns about the credibility and consistency of the league's disciplinary process.
Read at TheLeafsNation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]