The article discusses a critique of pollution-related research that assesses the impact of tech company data centers based on local emissions, disregarding their renewable energy investments. Companies like Google, Meta, and Microsoft argue that the estimates are exaggerated because they do not account for the renewable energy certificates they purchase. Google claims to achieve about 64% carbon-free energy on average, while Microsoft emphasizes its commitment to the economic and environmental well-being of operating communities. Meta promotes its transparency and aims for net-zero emissions in operations, asserting compliance with air quality standards.
Unlike carbon emissions, the health impacts caused by a data center in one region cannot be offset by cleaner air elsewhere, said Shaolei Ren, associate professor at UC Riverside.
Google added that the health cost estimates were overstated and that it did not account for our clean energy purchases in the local markets where we operate, undermining the progress of clean energy resource growth.
Microsoft said it was focused on delivering significant local, economic, social, and environmental benefits to the communities where we operate.
Meta said it complies with air quality requirements and remains committed to maintaining net zero greenhouse gas emissions for our global operations, supporting the communities where we operate.
Collection
[
|
...
]