"We lock a 10, 100 or 1000 people in one office and expect that they (complete universes unto themselves, each generating thoughts and questions every second) will somehow function as a single, finely tuned mechanism. I've worked across the full spectrum myself: in three-person startups and three-thousand-person enterprises, as an employee, as a design lead, as an agency director, and as a founder."
"And I've always wondered what separates the companies that navigate their own growth gracefully, where the CEO becomes someone worth emulating, from those where the leader is someone people learn to avoid. This article isn't just for CEOs. It's for entrepreneurs, managers, team leads, and individual contributors too. Because work in a collective of more than one person isn't one-directional communication. Each of us needs to understand the rules of the jungle."
Organizations contain individuals who continuously generate thoughts and questions. Teams of 10, 100, or 1000 cannot be expected to operate as a single finely tuned mechanism without deliberate cultural alignment. Organizational size varies from three-person startups to three-thousand-person enterprises, and leadership quality determines whether growth is navigated gracefully or avoided. Work in groups is multi-directional communication rather than one-way transmission. Each person must understand informal rules and norms to collaborate effectively. Psychology, anthropology, and myth provide frameworks to analyze how culture shapes behavior and leadership. Effective culture aligns individual motivations, communication patterns, and structures to enable cohesive scaling.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]