Ben & Jerry's has been embroiled in disputes with its parent company, Unilever, particularly regarding the former's commitment to progressive values. The recent removal of CEO David Stever has intensified tensions, with allegations claiming Unilever's motive was related to Stever's dedication to the brand's social mission rather than performance issues. Past conflicts included censorship of statements on critical social issues, and ongoing legal actions underscore the brand's commitment to activism and corporate integrity against perceived censorship by Unilever.
Ben & Jerry's has been in disputes with Unilever over progressive commentary, culminating in CEO David Stever's removal due to his commitment to the brand's social mission.
The lawsuit alleges Unilever's motive for Stever’s removal was his advocacy and not genuine performance concerns, highlighting ongoing tensions over censorship.
Unilever allegedly impeded statements from Ben & Jerry's on multiple progressive issues including abortion and climate change, raising concerns of corporate censorship.
Ben & Jerry's claims Unilever's attempts to silence activism extend to blocking support for detained Palestinian green card holders, reflecting longstanding activism tensions.
Collection
[
|
...
]