AI Coding Tools Underperform in Field Study with Experienced Developers
Briefly

AI Coding Tools Underperform in Field Study with Experienced Developers
"The study revealed that developers using AI tools, including Claude 3.5 and Cursor Pro, experienced a 19% increase in task completion time despite believing they were working faster."
"Researchers conducted their study using experienced open-source developers in production-grade environments, rather than synthetic benchmarks, to assess the real effects of AI on software development."
"Eyes were on a gap between AI's perceived benefits and its actual impact, as developers and external experts expected a productivity increase of ~40%, but results showed a significant slowdown instead."
"Only 16 professional developers with an average of five years of experience participated, tackling realistic issues from large, mature open-source projects across 246 tasks."
A study shows that AI-enhanced development tools do not necessarily increase productivity in software development. Conducted with experienced open-source developers, the researchers found that those using AI took 19% longer to complete tasks than those without AI. This was contrary to the expectation of a 40% speedup. Participants worked on realistic issues from large open-source projects, and both objective and subjective metrics were collected. The findings expose a disparity between the perceived efficiency of AI tools and their real-world effects on developer performance.
Read at InfoQ
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]