"The justices emphasized that the case concerns Meta's own conduct, not user content. 'The claims do not seek to impose liability on Meta for information provided by third parties,' the court wrote. 'Instead, the claims allege harm stemming from Meta's own conduct,' including designing platforms that 'capitalize on the developmental vulnerabilities of children' and misleading users about safety."
"The ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court clears the way for Attorney General Andrea Campbell to go forward with a lawsuit against Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The suit alleges that addictive features such as incessant notifications, infinite scrolling, and time-limited prompts exploit and harm young users."
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that Meta is not immune from lawsuits regarding its platform design, allowing Attorney General Andrea Campbell's lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit claims that features like infinite scrolling and incessant notifications exploit young users. The court clarified that Section 230 does not protect Meta from liability for its own conduct, emphasizing that the claims are based on the company's design choices rather than user-generated content. This ruling coincides with new legislation aimed at restricting social media access for children under 14 in Massachusetts.
Read at Boston.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]