"The amended version also dropped both the mandatory discipline section and the private civil enforcement section, including an exception to Tennessee's anti-SLAPP law."
"The law says that people can be punished for 'staging walk-outs during an event or in the middle of an invited speaker's remarks that result in material and substantial disruption.'"
"Using signs or objects in a way to block or impede an audience member's view of an invited speaker ... has no restriction requiring intent to censor and a substantial disruption."
The Charlie Kirk Act in Tennessee has generated debate regarding its implications for free speech at public universities. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression views the law as a victory for free expression, noting that harmful provisions were removed in the final version. Critics, however, express concern over potential abuses of the law, particularly regarding penalties for protests that disrupt events. A specific provision about blocking views raises alarms about its potential misuse against protesters, indicating a complex landscape for free speech rights.
Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]