Supreme Court Narrowly Interprets Landmark Reduced Sentencing Law
Briefly

The decision, by a vote of 6 to 3, did not split along ideological lines. The majority opinion... concluded that a criminal defendant must meet a series of criminal history conditions to qualify for relief.
The case delved into whether one type of criminal history alone disqualifies a person from a lighter sentence or if all three must be present for disqualification. Justice Kagan's opinion adopted the tone of an English teacher.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
add
]
[
|
|
]