The judge deemed capping the $38 million abuse verdict at $475,000 as 'an unconscionable miscarriage of justice.' He dismissed options like reconvening the jury or questioning them, seeking a fair resolution.
Acknowledging the confusion, Judge Schulman pointed out the inconsistency between the $38 million awarded and the jury's finding of a 'single incident' of abuse, rejecting applying the damages cap.
Collection
[
|
...
]