A framework for addressing racial and related inequities in conservation

"Proposes a set of standards for conservation practice to uphold rather than violate the human rights of Indigenous peoples under international law."

"This paper examines the systemic racism in conservation science and practice, reinforced by institutional structures and causing harm to BIPOC communities, and advances proposals to break this vicious cycle of racism."

"WWF funds guards who have tortured and killed people."

"Othering pastoralists, state violence, and the remaking of boundaries in Tanzania's militarised wildlife conservation sector."

Community-based conservation approaches emphasize local stewardship and the need to protect Indigenous rights under international law. Conservation standards should prevent human-rights violations and ensure responsibilities toward affected communities. Militarized conservation and funding of armed guards have been linked to violence, torture, and deaths among local people. Othering of pastoralists and state violence reshapes boundaries and marginalizes communities in conservation zones. Systemic racism in conservation science and institutions harms BIPOC communities and demands structural reform. Governance indicators and social movements like Black Lives Matter underscore the importance of accountability, rights-based practice, and equitable participation in conservation decision-making.

Read at www.nature.com