"The oldest and best-known preprint repository, arXiv, has announced that it will no longer accept review or position papers in computer science. The website will make exceptions only for papers that have been previously accepted by a peer-reviewed venue, such as a journal or conference. These types of article were never officially on arXiv's list of 'accepted content types', but they had previously been allowed at moderator discretion, said a blog post announcing the move on 31 October."
"Preprints submitted to arXiv are checked by automated tools. Before going live on the site, around 20% of submissions are flagged to one of 240 volunteer moderators, says arXiv executive director Ramin Zabih, a computer scientist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. Until a year ago, only 2-3% of submissions were ultimately rejected by moderators, says Steinn Sigurðsson, an astrophysicist at Penn State University in University Park who is arXiv's scientific director. But in the last year, that number has gone up to 10%."
arXiv will no longer accept review or position papers in computer science, with exceptions only for manuscripts previously accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or conference. These article types had been allowed at moderator discretion despite not being officially listed as accepted content. arXiv management attributes the policy change to a surge in low-quality submissions, including many that appear to be generated using artificial intelligence tools. Richard Sever of openRxiv supports the decision and notes that biomedical preprint servers implemented a 'no narrative reviews' policy early on. Submissions undergo automated checks and about 20% are flagged to 240 volunteer moderators. Rejection rates rose from 2–3% to 10% in the last year.
Read at Nature
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]