
"For decades, modern warfare relied on the idea that overwhelming firepower could compensate for imperfect information and limited accuracy. When commanders could not be certain a single strike would succeed, they simply ordered more. Precision weapons changed that calculus. By making individual shots count, these systems shifted combat away from volume and toward discipline, forcing militaries to value patience, timing, and decision-making as much as raw destructive power."
"Understanding how warfare shifted from massed firepower to deliberate precision helps explain many of the tactical and ethical choices modern militaries now face. Precision weapons did more than improve accuracy; they changed how commanders think about timing, restraint, and responsibility on the battlefield. By examining the systems that rewarded patience over volume, this shows why modern combat increasingly depends on intelligence, discipline, and decision-making rather than sheer destructive capacity."
Modern warfare shifted from reliance on overwhelming volume to prioritizing precision, patience, and disciplined decision-making. Precision weapons made each strike more consequential, reducing the effectiveness of massed artillery and saturation bombing as default solutions. Commanders now must value timing, restraint, intelligence, and responsibility when selecting targets, often waiting for better information or opportunity. The tactical environment rewards restraint over indiscriminate firepower, increasing the importance of superior targeting, disciplined doctrine, and ethical considerations. The ability to delay action until favorable conditions exist has become as strategically important as the capacity to strike.
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]