Make science more collegial: why the time for 'adversarial collaboration' has come
Briefly

The article discusses the concept of adversarial collaborations in scientific research, promoted by psychologist Daniel Kahneman. These collaborations bring together rival theorists to test their ideas against each other, aiming to transcend the contentious debates that often plague scientific discourse. While the initiative is designed to foster cooperation and shared understanding, mixed results indicate that some researchers still engage in strong defenses of their positions. Kahneman's perspective emphasizes that the true potential of such collaborations can only be realized when all participants acknowledge the possibility of being wrong.
Bringing together proponents of rival theories can advance science, but only if all sides can accept that they might be wrong.
Controversy is a 'terrible way to advance science', said psychologist Daniel Kahneman. By stimulating competing groups to work together, the goal is to find shared truths.
The findings of an adversarial collaboration to test theories about consciousness revealed that some scientists still resorted to strong language to defend their positions.
For adversarial collaborations to truly advance science, it's essential that all parties are prepared to accept the possibility of being wrong.
Read at Nature
[
|
]