The article discusses the bureaucratic challenges facing the DOGE initiative led by Amy Gleason, emphasizing how its incompetence and the controversial administration of Elon Musk create a unique landscape for regime opponents. This dynamic raises questions about the legal legitimacy of their actions, which could have been avoided with better management. The author notes that the strategic choice of the US Digital Service by Trump serves to bypass transparency and disclosure laws, giving DOGE a distinct advantage in navigating legal hurdles while simultaneously highlighting the catastrophic outcomes of the current administration's decisions.
"DOGE's bureaucratic incompetence and the leadership of Amy Gleason provide legal leverage against rapid changes in governance, despite the disastrous consequences of Elon's management approach."
"By utilizing the US Digital Service, Trump circumvented federal disclosure mandates, effectively shielding DOGE from legal challenges and maintaining control under Article II powers."
Collection
[
|
...
]