The upcoming Supreme Court case Soto v. US is significant for combat-disabled veterans, as it will determine if they can claim full retroactive Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) payments beyond the six-year limitation set by the Barring Act. Marine veteran Simon Soto, who suffers from PTSD linked to his service, argues that the CRSC law provides alternative settlement authority which should allow for full benefits retroactively. The outcome could impact thousands of veterans seeking similar entitlements.
Soto argues that the CRSC statute itself, which specifically pertains to benefits for combat-related disabilities, should override the general six-year limit imposed by the Barring Act.
The Supreme Court's decision in Soto v. US could set a precedent that may influence how retroactive benefits are granted to veterans, potentially expanding access for those impacted.
Collection
[
|
...
]