In the wake of California's budget season, Governor Gavin Newsom proposed a $322 billion budget that notably includes a $300 million withdrawal from the recently approved $10 billion climate bond, passed with 60% voter support. While this amount is only 3% of the bond, it raises concerns about precedent and transparency. Voters expected these funds to address climate change challenges such as wildfire prevention, not to be used to balance state budgets. Republican Sen. Roger Niello warns that such actions could undermine the intent of voter-approved measures and set a troubling pattern for future budgets.
It's the principle of the money grab. This could set a worrying precedent for future budget balancing by dipping into voter-approved funding.
Voters were led to believe that Proposition 4 would accelerate preparation for facing climate change, not be used as a budgetary maneuver.
For 14 years, one-party rule has allowed California’s legislature to follow the governor's lead without much opposition, complicating budgetary oversight.
Sen. Roger Niello warns that using funds from the climate bond may lead to a slippery slope of budgetary reliance on dedicated funds.
Collection
[
|
...
]