Proposition 5 aimed to ease financing for affordable housing and public projects by reducing the local bond approval threshold from two-thirds to 55%. Its defeat leaves significant infrastructure needs unmet.
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association stated that Proposition 5 was a disguised tax increase, arguing voters preferred to keep the status quo rather than risk higher taxes for infrastructure spending.
Supporters of Proposition 5 emphasized the ongoing struggle to tackle California's housing crisis, asserting that transformative actions are still urgently needed to enhance affordable living and local infrastructure.
Despite the loss, advocates for Proposition 5 maintain that the fight for affordable housing and improved infrastructure in California will continue, highlighting the pressing nature of these issues in the state.
Collection
[
|
...
]