The ads attacking Sam Liccardo by Evan Low's campaigns are rooted in irony, suggesting corruption from Liccardo when in fact, it's Low who received contributions from a corrupt CEO.
Evan Low has accepted tens of thousands of dollars from California Waste Solutions and its CEO, directly contradicting the ads claiming Liccardo took money from them.
Liccardo's connection to contributions supporting open space was indirect and not solicitated, while Low's direct financial relationship with Duong illustrates a clear conflict.
Truth in politics is crucial; the misleading statements in campaign ads detract from serious discussions needed for the 16th Congressional District and its communities.
Collection
[
|
...
]