The article argues in favor of Mayor Mahan's proposal to introduce new accountability measures for San Jose's city council members by allocating 5% of their salary for performance evaluations. The proposal aims to improve governance, addressing the shortcomings of the current evaluation system that focuses solely on election cycles. It counters criticisms from a recent opinion piece, suggesting that regular reviews can lead to better management in public office, akin to performance reviews in the business sector. Moreover, concerns about PG&E's involvement in local politics during critical negotiations raise potential ethical issues that threaten public trust.
Implementing new accountability measures for San Jose's council members can enhance governance, as currently, the only evaluation they face is once every four years at the ballot.
Critics of Mayor Mahan's proposal seem unaware of the advantages of regular performance reviews, which could lead to more effective governance and accountability among officials.
Collection
[
|
...
]