Former employees of the GSA's 18F unit have filed a class-action appeal after their positions were terminated, which they argue lacked valid justification and was retaliatory. They claim their dismissal was influenced by their colleagues’ political affiliations and whistleblowing activities regarding management’s mishandling of sensitive projects. The dissolution of 18F is considered detrimental not only to the employees but also to ongoing federal technology modernization efforts. Represented by a law firm, these employees are pursuing their case through the Merit Systems Protection Board, as GSA seeks to align its operations with the Trump administration’s regulatory priorities.
The employees argued that the elimination of 18F was a retaliatory move against their political affiliations and whistleblowing on management's handling of sensitive data.
The impact of disbanding 18F extends beyond those who lost their jobs, threatening the progress of critical technology modernization projects crucial for public service.
GSA's decision to eliminate 18F was framed by management as making the unit 'non-critical,' reflecting broader changes under the Trump administration's efficiency agenda.
The appeal marked a significant step, allowing the former employees to challenge their dismissals and seek reinstatement in a climate of organizational and political shifts.
Collection
[
|
...
]