Ed Martin, the acting US Attorney for DC, is currently targeting Wikipedia for its sourcing practices, particularly regarding The Federalist. He asserts that as a nonprofit, Wikimedia must adhere to legal obligations ensuring neutrality and accountability. Martin, who has a controversial background, including representing January 6 rioters, has made waves during his brief tenure by engaging in various contentious activities, including dismissing cases against his clients and attempting to indict climate activists. His threats against Wikipedia reflect broader concerns about information management and political influence in credible sources.
As a nonprofit corporation, the Wikimedia Foundation is subject to legal obligations and fiduciary duties consistent with its tax-exempt status, implying a public expectation of neutrality.
Martinâs brief tenure has been eventful; when he's not threatening Congress, he's dropping cases against former clients or putting experienced prosecutors on misdemeanors.
Despite never having worked as a prosecutor, Martinâs time at the US Attorneyâs Office is characterized by actions like attempting to indict climate activists during his controversial leadership.
Martin's attack on Wikipedia raises questions about his motives and the implications of his stance on information neutrality, especially regarding its board's international composition.
Collection
[
|
...
]