What the Supreme Court ruling on gender identity means for students, parents, and schools

"Ultimately, the issues are about the right of parents to be informed as opposed to the ability of the state to protect the privacy rights of children. The Court, 6-3, comes down in favor of the former. This represents a fundamental prioritization of parental notification rights over student privacy protections in matters concerning gender identity exploration at school."

"In his Dec. 22 decision, Benitez ruled that parents have a federal constitutional right to know of LGBTQ+ issues affecting their children at school. Moreover, he said teachers had free speech and freedom-of-religion rights to tell parents about their child's gender-identity issues if the teacher wanted to do so."

"The Supreme Court did not lift the stay related to employees. So, it's not clear what teachers have the right to say to parents who don't inquire about the issue, legal experts said. However, if parents want to know, school employees must tell parents whether, for example, a student is exploring a different gender identity at school."

The Supreme Court's decision in Mirabelli v. Bonta upholds parental rights to be informed about their children's gender identity matters at school, marking a significant shift from California's common practices. The ruling, based on a lower court decision by Judge Roger Benitez, establishes that parents have a federal constitutional right to this information. The court sided 6-3 with the interpretation favoring parental notification over student privacy protections. While the decision allows key portions of Benitez's ruling to take effect during ongoing appeals, ambiguity remains regarding teachers' obligations to proactively disclose such information. School employees must provide information when parents specifically request it, but the extent of unsolicited disclosure requirements remains unclear.

Read at Los Angeles Times