Image of water polo players in Speedos sparks feud. Mom demands SoCal school officials resign

"The team posted the photograph on a school Instagram page. It caught the attention of Temecula Valley Unified School District Board President Joseph Komrosky and member Jennifer Wiersma. "Speaking of dress code...are our teams now an 'OnlyFans' crew? Hats off to the kids that kept their pants on," Wiersma wrote in a caption for an Instagram story reposting the image of the students."

""If they want to support the baseball team or any other team, they can do it by simply saying they do and looking like professionals," he wrote in an Instagram comment. "My concern is that I do not want them to look like they're in a sexually provocative strip tease looking like their one step close to the Chippendales. We don't need that in our school district in our community.""

"Sardina's son, a junior at Temecula Valley High School, had posed with five fellow water polo team members shirtless in their Speedos. The teens had written "B-E-A-R-S-!" across their chests in support of the school's baseball team. The dispute was sparked two weeks ago when Sharon Sardina heard from a friend that her 17-year-old son was being discussed online."

"Others seem to agree with Sardina. "If this is the jump, you shouldn't be around kids," Instagram user Stephanie Berry wrote in a response to Komro"

A group of high school water polo players posted a photo wearing Speedos with “B-E-A-R-S-!” printed across their chests to support the school’s baseball team. The image appeared on a school Instagram page and drew attention from two Temecula Valley Unified School District board members. One member questioned whether the teams had become like an adult entertainment brand, while the board president criticized the photo as sexually provocative and compared it to strip-tease imagery. The mother of a player said the comments sexualized her son and called for the two board members to resign. Online responses included agreement with the criticism and concerns about whether such imagery should involve minors.

Read at Los Angeles Times