Daniel Soto's attorney, Katherine Fernandez, argues that the case against him for the alleged rape of Emmarae Gervasi is weak, primarily due to issues in the photo identification process. She claims that the victim's identification was skewed by a police photograph that was noticeably larger than the others, leading to potential misidentification. Furthermore, Fernandez points out that Soto's name was not mentioned in initial police statements, suggesting a fragile basis for the prosecution's case.
Katherine Fernandez, attorney for alleged rapist Daniel Soto, stated the identification by the victim was compromised due to a photo with a noticeable resizing, raising doubts about the case's strength.
Fernandez claimed that the integrity of the police photo array was compromised, asserting that Soto's enlarged image skewed the identification process against him.
Collection
[
|
...
]