Mark Cancian, a retired Marine Corps colonel, indicated that Russia's cautious use of glide bombs in Kursk is indicative of its weak air control systems, comparing it unfavorably to the US and NATO approaches. He stated, "I think that's a reflection of a weak air control system," further emphasizing that the lack of sophistication in Russia's mechanisms limits their effectiveness in combat operations, particularly in scenarios involving potential friendly fire.
According to Cancian, Russia's glide bomb usage in static frontlines has been effective. He mentioned, "Russia is able to heavily use glide bombs in Ukraine because the front is static and largely unmoving, so Russia can get away with a weaker control system and less unintended damage." This reflects a strategic approach to maximize efficacy despite inherent weaknesses.
Despite having advanced glide bombs equipped with guidance systems, Russia's reluctance to utilize them in Kursk points to systemic issues. An expert explained, "Russia’s weak air control systems mean it struggles to use the bombs accurately," highlighting that the operational limits hinder their combat capability.
The disparity between US and Russian military capabilities was highlighted when Cancian remarked on the latter's operating procedures, saying, "The US is pretty good at it. The Russians are not." This emphasizes the contrast in operational readiness and effectiveness between the two military forces.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]