The article discusses a controversy surrounding Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlantic's editor-in-chief, who participated in a private Signal chat discussing military strategies, raising ethical questions about journalistic integrity. Notably included in the chat were influential figures from the Trump administration, highlighting the connections between media and neoconservative politics. Critics faced in a media landscape focusing on Trump's competence missed the broader implications of neoconservatives working against Trump's peacemaking desire. The article illustrates how Goldberg has historically promoted neocon narratives, which have significant consequences on U.S. foreign policy and media credibility.
The chat involving Jeffrey Goldberg raises questions on how a journalist became part of sensitive national security discussions, emphasizing potential shortcomings in the Trump administration.
Neoconservatives like Goldberg and Mike Waltz consistently undermined President Trump's peacemaking efforts, showing a united front in their foreign policy agendas.
Goldberg has been a reliable purveyor of neocon narratives, fabricating relationships like the one between Iraq and al-Qaeda to persuade the public for war.
The Atlantic's editor-in-chief being part of a confidential chat is troubling, as it highlights the intertwined relationships between media and political elites.
Collection
[
|
...
]