
"After years of drifting ideology giving way to vibes, personality eclipsing principle a question has finally forced itself into view: Who gets to decide what it means to be right-wing? That question snapped into focus when Tucker Carlson chose to host Nick Fuentes, an openly antisemitic, white-supremacist troll. Fuentes is not complicated. He is clear. He is poison. Carlson's interview wasn't journalism; it was a declaration of borderlessness. If platforming is inherently neutral, then even the most explicit hatemongers can be folded into the tent."
"Into this hazy perimeter stepped an unexpected counterforce: Ben Shapiro. Shapiro is no moderate, nor gentle, nor allergic to provocation. But he does believe in lines boundaries that define a movement not only by who it includes, but who it excludes. And when Carlson chose not to question Fuentes, Shapiro called it out directly. He challenged Megyn Kelly for giving Carlson a pass. He canceled appearances with others who had offered similar grace. In a conservative ecosystem built on mutually assured silence, this was apostasy."
American conservatism faces a crisis of definition as platforming and personality have eclipsed coherent ideology. Tucker Carlson hosted Nick Fuentes, normalizing borderless platforming that can include explicit hatemongers. Ben Shapiro pushed back, arguing for definitive boundaries, calling out Carlson, challenging peers and canceling appearances to enforce exclusion. The core dispute centers on whether a movement should include everyone or exclude extremists. Without gatekeeping, vacuums are filled by extreme voices; populist entertainment and Trump-style brand politics have eroded institution-based conservatism, leaving opposition to elites and media as the movement’s remaining unifying principle.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]