The Real Supreme Court Endgame for Abortion Foes
Briefly

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was thought by some to pave the way for compassionate compromises on abortion, enabling local policymakers to address the issue directly. However, instead of fostering dialogue, the move has led to stricter state-level bans and an intensification of the abortion conflict. As states enact increasingly extreme laws, many voters are being disenfranchised, with some politicians discouraging ballot initiatives. The current political climate reveals a paradox: those who opposed federal intervention are now circumventing democratic norms in the debate over abortion choice.
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, debates over abortion have intensified, as states are increasingly enacting stringent laws without seeking compromise.
The current landscape shows a troubling trend: rather than facilitating voter expression on abortion via ballot initiatives, some Republicans are actively undermining democratic processes.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]