As the Supreme Court season intensifies, Professor Leah Litman sheds light on the alarming influence of conservative grievances within the judicial system. Justice Elena Kagan expressed her frustration with her fellow justices, particularly following a contentious debate over a carve-out affecting their investments. This discontent reflects broader concerns about the Court's handling of critical cases, including birthright citizenship. Additionally, political figures like Kristi Noem's struggle to articulate fundamental legal principles raises questions about the competency of those in power to navigate constitutional law.
Professor Leah Litman's discussion alerts us to a troubling trend in the Supreme Court, highlighting justices' decisions fueled by grievances rather than sound legal principles.
Elena Kagan’s pointed criticisms of her colleagues signal a growing divide within the Court, particularly regarding their handling of key issues like birthright citizenship.
The failure of Kristi Noem to define habeas corpus during Senate proceedings raises significant concerns about the baseline legal knowledge expected from government officials.
Collection
[
|
...
]