The article discusses the Denial of Association fallacy, which occurs when individuals or groups deny negative claims about themselves by asserting that problematic members are not genuine members. This is a form of fallacious reasoning as it relies on emotional investment in the group rather than concrete evidence. The fallacy draws its strength from psychological factors, making it challenging for supporters to acknowledge any flaws in groups they identify with. It highlights the opposition to guilt by association while underscoring the importance of recognizing genuine issues within beloved groups.
The Denial of Association fallacy manifests when individuals dismiss negative claims about a group they support by asserting—without valid evidence—that accused members are not true members.
This reasoning is fallacious because simply asserting that problematic alleged members are not true members does not prove that the claim is not true about the group.
The psychological tendency to deny negative characteristics of favored groups highlights the need to remain vigilant against both guilt by association and denial of association fallacies.
The persuasive power of the Denial of Association fallacy heavily relies on an individual’s emotional and psychological attachment to the group, rather than logical reasoning.
Collection
[
|
...
]