Nobody Claiming to Respect Rule of Law Is Convincing
Briefly

The article discusses the contentious nature of presidential pardons during politically charged times, particularly focusing on the actions of Presidents Biden and Trump on January 20. Each administration's supporters defend their pardons as necessary for protecting their allies from partisan persecution. However, the situation highlights the complexities and limits of executive power, with many Democrats reflecting on these limits amid their critiques of Trump's disregard for constitutional constraints. Ultimately, the pardons act as reflections of each president's approach to authority and governance amid a polarized political landscape.
Yet, in a broader context, both Biden and Trump exhibit a propensity to push the envelope of executive power, altering the landscape of democratic norms.
Trump's supporters argue his pardons were necessary maneuvers against perceived political persecution, while Biden's defenders view his actions as safeguards for the wrongfully accused.
Read at The American Conservative
[
|
]