The ruling of the military appeals court enables three 9/11 defendants, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, to proceed with plea deals, thus avoiding the death penalty. These deals were brought to light in July, presented as a means to bring closure to long-standing legal proceedings. However, a contentious intervention happened in August when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin attempted to rescind these agreements, leading to an examination of legal authority and procedural timing.
Air Force Colonel Matthew McCall's November ruling, which affirmed the validity of the plea deals, posited that Secretary Austin did not possess the authority to withdraw the already ratified agreements. This judgment reinforces the legal principle that once a deal is sanctioned and publicly disclosed, subsequent attempts to rescind must be well-founded and timely—factors that appear to have influenced the military appeals court's understanding and affirmation of the original decision.
Collection
[
|
...
]